🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income must contribute approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of clients who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many federal defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with increased taxation required, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.